Updated: July 9, 2020 (May 24, 2004)

  Sidebar

Patch Management Technology to Converge

My Atlas / Sidebar

507 wordsTime to read: 3 min
Rob Helm by
Rob Helm

As managing vice president, Rob Helm covers Microsoft collaboration and content management. His 25-plus years of experience analyzing Microsoft’s technology... more

Although Microsoft is to be commended for trying to make patch management easier, more comprehensive, and free with Windows, the fact that Windows Update and the free Software Update Services (SUS) appear to do the same job as Systems Management Server, or SMS (a separate server product), has caused some customer confusion. Other than the SMS 2003 Advanced Client’s use of the Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS)— technology first developed by the Windows Update team to download patch files in the background over Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)—SMS, Windows Update, and SUS today share very little common technology.

Microsoft positions SMS as the best patch-management tool for large enterprises, which likely need SMS’s more capable targeting and reporting capabilities, as well as its other features not geared toward patch management (such as general software distribution, software and hardware inventory, remote control, and software usage tracking). Microsoft also recommends that home users and very small businesses simply turn on Windows’ Automatic Update feature today and use the new Windows Update Services (WUS) agent when it ships later this year to automatically download and install patches. However, deciding which product to use is more complicated for small and medium-size businesses.

Atlas Members have full access

Get access to this and thousands of other unbiased analyses, roadmaps, decision kits, infographics, reference guides, and more, all included with membership. Comprehensive access to the most in-depth and unbiased expertise for Microsoft enterprise decision-making is waiting.

Membership Options

Already have an account? Login Now