Updated: July 10, 2020 (June 23, 2003)
SidebarWhy Exchange 2000 Posed Backup Difficulties
On many Exchange administrators’ wish lists for the successor to Exchange 2000 was a new backup and restore architecture. The Exchange 2000 architecture is inadequate for two main reasons:
Slow restore times. Because Exchange 2000 servers must be offline during the restore process, restoring data from a backup can affect the availability of e-mail. As Exchange 2000 message databases grew past a certain size, it became impossible to guarantee users a reasonable recovery time should a live database become damaged.
Some storage vendors (such as Veritas Software) use proprietary disk-volume snapshot schemes to frequently capture and set aside copies of the live Exchange 2000 storage groups, which can be used to perform tapeless restores of corrupted Exchange data. However, because Exchange 2000 was not designed to work directly with a snapshot system, Microsoft does not support Exchange 2000 recovery in this manner, and even Veritas recommends that administrators also be prepared to restore Exchange 2000 from tape in the event that the snapshot copy is unusable.
Atlas Members have full access
Get access to this and thousands of other unbiased analyses, roadmaps, decision kits, infographics, reference guides, and more, all included with membership. Comprehensive access to the most in-depth and unbiased expertise for Microsoft enterprise decision-making is waiting.
Membership OptionsAlready have an account? Login Now