Updated: August 26, 2024 (August 26, 2024)

  Charts & Illustrations

Storage Costs Mount With Customer Choices for Azure SQL PaaS

My Atlas / Charts & Illustrations

273 wordsTime to read: 2 min
Rob Sanfilippo by
Rob Sanfilippo

Before joining Directions on Microsoft, Rob worked at Microsoft for 14 years where he designed technologies for Microsoft products and... more

Storage costs can grow quickly and outpace compute costs depending on customer selections for Azure SQL PaaS offerings. Shown here are four deployment scenarios for Azure SQL Managed Instance (all are based on the service’s General purpose purchase tier). The four scenarios demonstrate that choosing higher levels of redundancy (typically to address disaster recovery and archiving needs) can make storage costs substantially higher than compute costs.

The scenarios include the following:

  • Top left: No backup or long-term retention is purchased
  • Top right: Backup storage equivalent to the amount of primary storage is purchased, and the locally redundant storage (LRS) redundancy option is selected for the backup. No long-term retention is purchased
  • Bottom left: Backup storage equivalent to the amount of primary storage is purchased, and the read-access geo-zone-redundant storage (RA-GZS) redundancy option is selected for the backup. No long-term retention is purchased
  • Bottom right: Backup storage

Atlas Members have full access

Get access to this and thousands of other unbiased analyses, roadmaps, decision kits, infographics, reference guides, and more, all included with membership. Comprehensive access to the most in-depth and unbiased expertise for Microsoft enterprise decision-making is waiting.

Membership Options

Already have an account? Login Now