Updated: July 11, 2020 (April 2, 2000)

  Sidebar

Why Active Directory Requires Companywide Planning

My Atlas / Sidebar

372 wordsTime to read: 2 min
Rob Helm by
Rob Helm

As managing vice president, Rob Helm covers Microsoft collaboration and content management. His 25-plus years of experience analyzing Microsoft’s technology... more

Companies can migrate to the Windows 2000 operating system incrementally-machine-by-machine or department-by-department-but they can’t migrate to the Active Directory service this way. Companies can deploy Active Directory department-by-department; Windows 2000’s “mixed mode” enables companies to bring it up on one domain controller at a time and fall back to NT 4.0 if necessary. However, before activating its first Windows 2000 domain controller, a company must take care of several tasks:

Name space design. Active Directory requires companies to assign a unique name to each object (user, machine, and so forth) on the network. The names must align with the company’s domain name system (DNS) structure and comply with DNS naming conventions, which are more restrictive than those of existing Windows name services and may force companies to rename machines. Also, an object’s name strongly influences the security properties of the object-what rights which users have to that object. Name space design is thus a companywide effort, because it must align with DNS, and is politically risky because it determines security boundaries between departments.

Atlas Members have full access

Get access to this and thousands of other unbiased analyses, roadmaps, decision kits, infographics, reference guides, and more, all included with membership. Comprehensive access to the most in-depth and unbiased expertise for Microsoft enterprise decision-making is waiting.

Membership Options

Already have an account? Login Now